Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLSX vs RGEBX
LGLSX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LGLSX vs RGEBX
LGLSX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLSX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLSX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LGLSX (8.03B). LGLSX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGLSX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LGLSX (11 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than LGLSX (0.89). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: LGLSX (0) vs RGEBX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.17 vs. RGEBX (7.66). LGLSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. RGEBX (12.07).
| LGLSX | RGEBX | LGLSX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.275 | 6.118 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.17 | 7.66 | 289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.79 | 42.13 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 12.07 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.05 | 104.15 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement