Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGMCX vs RIDAX
LGMCX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts LGMCX vs RIDAX
LGMCX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGMCX vs. RIDAX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGMCX is a Hold and RIDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. LGMCX (2.78B). RIDAX pays higher dividends than LGMCX: RIDAX (2.76) vs LGMCX (0.22). LGMCX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: LGMCX (20 years) vs RIDAX (24 years). LGMCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.34). RIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. LGMCX (35.00). RIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMCX: RIDAX (250) vs LGMCX (2500). RIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. LGMCX (4.82). RIDAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.11 vs. LGMCX (-10.35).
| LGMCX | RIDAX | LGMCX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.34 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.34 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.052 | 5.737 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 147B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 2.76 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.82 | 6.12 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.80 | 31.26 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.35 | 19.11 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.87 | 49.61 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement