Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGMNX vs RCEEX
LGMNX vs RCEEX Comparison
Open Charts LGMNX vs RCEEX
LGMNX vs RCEEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGMNX vs. RCEEX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGMNX is a Hold and RCEEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCEEX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. LGMNX (2.83B). RCEEX pays higher dividends than LGMNX: RCEEX (2.30) vs LGMNX (1.25). LGMNX was incepted earlier than RCEEX: LGMNX (9 years) vs RCEEX (12 years). RCEEX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LGMNX (0.83). RCEEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LGMNX (35.00). RCEEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMNX: RCEEX (250) vs LGMNX (1000000). RCEEX (11.68) and LGMNX (11.29) have marching annual gain over last year. RCEEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.64 vs. LGMNX (-0.07).
| LGMNX | RCEEX | LGMNX / RCEEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.06 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.06 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.346 | 7.193 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 128B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.30 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.29 | 11.68 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.87 | 29.39 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.07 | 35.64 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers