LGO
Price
$1.27
Change
-$0.03 (-2.31%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
105.49M
53 days until earnings call
NICLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.78M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LGO vs NICLF

Header iconLGO vs NICLF Comparison
Open Charts LGO vs NICLFBanner chart's image
Largo
Price$1.27
Change-$0.03 (-2.31%)
Volume$72.43K
Capitalization105.49M
Class 1 Nickel and Technologies
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$1.59K
Capitalization2.78M
LGO vs NICLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGO vs. NICLF commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGO is a Hold and NICLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LGO: $1.27 vs. NICLF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: LGO and NICLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGO: 74% vs. NICLF: 52%
Market capitalization -- LGO: $105.49M vs. NICLF: $2.78M
LGO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $105.49M. NICLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNICLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NICLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NICLF is a better buy in the long-term than LGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LGO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.62% price change this week, while NICLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGO($105M) has a higher market cap than NICLF($2.78M). NICLF YTD gains are higher at: 59.955 vs. LGO (-26.163). LGO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.82M vs. NICLF (-5.68M). LGO has more cash in the bank: 42.7M vs. NICLF (382K). NICLF has less debt than LGO: NICLF (1.78M) vs LGO (76.5M). LGO has higher revenues than NICLF: LGO (199M) vs NICLF (0).
LGONICLFLGO / NICLF
Capitalization105M2.78M3,782%
EBITDA3.82M-5.68M-67%
Gain YTD-26.16359.955-44%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue199M0-
Total Cash42.7M382K11,178%
Total Debt76.5M1.78M4,298%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGO: Fundamental Ratings
LGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALLIX113.07N/A
N/A
AB Large Cap Growth I
NBHCX14.51N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Equity Income C
BSVIX15.61N/A
N/A
Baird Equity Opportunity Institutional
GAHPX25.94N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq P
WAMVX3.96-0.09
-2.22%
Wasatch Micro Cap Value

LGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGO has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGO jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGO
1D Price
Change %
LGO100%
-2.31%
TECK - LGO
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
LAC - LGO
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
LAR - LGO
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
BHP - LGO
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
FCX - LGO
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
More

NICLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NICLF and KGHPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NICLF and KGHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NICLF
1D Price
Change %
NICLF100%
N/A
KGHPF - NICLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.79%
SLTFF - NICLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTSRF - NICLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
NBYCF - NICLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
LGO - NICLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
More