Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGPSX vs RGAHX
LGPSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts LGPSX vs RGAHX
LGPSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGPSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGPSX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LGPSX (68M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than LGPSX: RGAHX (0.40) vs LGPSX (0.00). LGPSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: LGPSX (24 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). LGPSX (2.70) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). LGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1217.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGPSX: RGAHX (250) vs LGPSX (15000). LGPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. RGAHX (0.18). LGPSX return over 5 years is better than : 49.19 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| LGPSX | RGAHX | LGPSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 0.44 | 614% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 0.44 | 614% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.305 | 9.200 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.75 | 0.18 | 6,542% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.55 | 43.47 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.19 | 13.78 | 357% |
| Returns for 10 years | 213.36 | 106.68 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement