Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGRCX vs RGABX
LGRCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts LGRCX vs RGABX
LGRCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRCX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LGRCX (16.5B). LGRCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGRCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: LGRCX (23 years) vs RGABX (24 years). LGRCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LGRCX (7.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRCX: RGABX (250) vs LGRCX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.09 vs. LGRCX (-4.62). LGRCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.29 vs. RGABX (5.04).
| LGRCX | RGABX | LGRCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.38 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.38 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.008 | 8.220 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.5B | 353B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.62 | -3.09 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.42 | 37.25 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.29 | 5.04 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.75 | 84.67 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers