Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGRNX vs RGABX
LGRNX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts LGRNX vs RGABX
Loomis Sayles Growth N
Price$33.70
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.28B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
LGRNX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGRNX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGRNX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGRNX (18.3B). LGRNX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGRNX was incepted earlier than RGABX: LGRNX (13 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than LGRNX (0.57). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LGRNX (10.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGRNX: RGABX (250) vs LGRNX (1000000). LGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.15 vs. RGABX (15.98). LGRNX return over 5 years is better than : 53.96 vs. RGABX (40.59).
| LGRNX | RGABX | LGRNX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.39 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.39 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.992 | 17.133 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 336B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.15 | 15.98 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.50 | 54.27 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.96 | 40.59 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 219.19 | 85.86 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement