Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGVAX vs RMFCX
LGVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LGVAX vs RMFCX
LGVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LGVAX (4.2B). LGVAX (1.21) and RMFCX (1.19) have matching dividends . LGVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LGVAX (17 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LGVAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LGVAX (0.53). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGVAX: RMFCX (250) vs LGVAX (1000). LGVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. RMFCX (9.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.71 vs. LGVAX (-5.51).
| LGVAX | RMFCX | LGVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.332 | 6.953 | 163% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.2B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.19 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 9.31 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.12 | 34.52 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.51 | 34.71 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.65 | 94.50 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement