Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGVAX vs RMFCX
LGVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LGVAX vs RMFCX
LGVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGVAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LGVAX (4.3B). LGVAX (1.16) and RMFCX (1.15) have matching dividends . LGVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LGVAX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LGVAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LGVAX (0.53). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGVAX: RMFCX (250) vs LGVAX (1000). LGVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.13 vs. RMFCX (5.44). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.44 vs. LGVAX (3.63).
| LGVAX | RMFCX | LGVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.660 | 8.402 | 186% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.3B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.15 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 5.44 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.30 | 35.16 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.63 | 35.44 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.23 | 91.22 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement