Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGVAX vs RMFCX
LGVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LGVAX vs RMFCX
LGVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGVAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LGVAX (4.24B). LGVAX (1.20) and RMFCX (1.16) have matching dividends . LGVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LGVAX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LGVAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LGVAX (0.53). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGVAX: RMFCX (250) vs LGVAX (1000). LGVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. RMFCX (7.42). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.39 vs. LGVAX (1.90).
| LGVAX | RMFCX | LGVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.058 | 8.949 | 157% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 7.42 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.19 | 32.10 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.90 | 36.39 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.79 | 90.21 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement