Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGVAX vs RWMHX
LGVAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LGVAX vs RWMHX
LGVAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGVAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGVAX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LGVAX (4.22B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LGVAX: RWMHX (1.35) vs LGVAX (1.20). LGVAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LGVAX (17 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). LGVAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LGVAX (0.53). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGVAX: RWMHX (250) vs LGVAX (1000). LGVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. RWMHX (6.56). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.34 vs. LGVAX (-2.85).
| LGVAX | RWMHX | LGVAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.41 | 246% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.41 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.382 | 3.925 | 316% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.22B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.35 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.50 | 6.56 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.40 | 30.21 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | 27.34 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.63 | 80.70 | 95% |