Ad is loading...
LGZDF
Price
$8.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
MRT
Price
$1.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

LGZDF vs MRT

Header iconLGZDF vs MRT Comparison
Open Charts LGZDF vs MRTBanner chart's image
Logizard
Price$8.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$203
CapitalizationN/A
Marti Technologies
Price$1.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25.21K
CapitalizationN/A
LGZDF vs MRT Comparison Chart
Loading...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGZDF vs. MRT commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGZDF is a Hold and MRT is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LGZDF: $8.65 vs. MRT: $1.99)
Brand notoriety: LGZDF and MRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGZDF: 100% vs. MRT: 45%
Market capitalization -- LGZDF: $21.94M vs. MRT: $39.83M
LGZDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $21.94M. MRT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $39.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGZDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LGZDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the long-term than LGZDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MRT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

LGZDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRT (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRT($39.8M) has a higher market cap than LGZDF($21.9M). MRT YTD gains are higher at: 206.154 vs. LGZDF (31.061). LGZDF has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. MRT (3.97M). LGZDF has less debt than MRT: LGZDF (1.63M) vs MRT (28.4M).
LGZDFMRTLGZDF / MRT
Capitalization21.9M39.8M55%
EBITDA327MN/A-
Gain YTD31.061206.15415%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.82BN/A-
Total Cash1.22B3.97M30,806%
Total Debt1.63M28.4M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRT: Fundamental Ratings
MRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
97
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLTB49.760.02
+0.04%
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
ICAP27.39-0.05
-0.18%
InfraCap Equity Income ETF
IEO97.96-0.68
-0.69%
iShares US Oil & Gas Explor & Prod ETF
MOTO42.17-0.49
-1.15%
SmartETFs Smart Trans & Tch ETF
IGM98.57-2.49
-2.46%
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF

LGZDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGZDF and KSFTF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGZDF and KSFTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGZDF
1D Price
Change %
LGZDF100%
N/A
KSFTF - LGZDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNDO - LGZDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
HUBC - LGZDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.12%
MRT - LGZDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIDIY - LGZDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
More

MRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and HCAT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and HCAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRT
1D Price
Change %
MRT100%
N/A
HCAT - MRT
29%
Poorly correlated
-9.47%
LGZDF - MRT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBYH - MRT
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APPS - MRT
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.43%
PLGGF - MRT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More