Ad is loading...
LHCCX vs SHSAX
LHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHCCX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.45B vs. LHCCX (7.15M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: SHSAX (0.21) vs LHCCX (0.00). LHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: LHCCX (6 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). LHCCX (4.28) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: SHSAX (1000) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.62 vs. SHSAX (-15.09). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.02 vs. SHSAX (-3.19).
| LHCCX | SHSAX | LHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.09 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.28 | 1.09 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.859 | -6.182 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.15M | 6.45B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.62 | -15.09 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.37 | -20.07 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.02 | -3.19 | -189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...