Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LHCCX vs SHSAX
LHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison
Open Charts LHCCX vs SHSAX
LHCCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LHCCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LHCCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. LHCCX (8.85M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: SHSAX (0.27) vs LHCCX (0.00). LHCCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: LHCCX (7 years) vs SHSAX (27 years). LHCCX (4.23) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: SHSAX (1000) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.92 vs. SHSAX (8.26). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.59 vs. SHSAX (-17.88).
| LHCCX | SHSAX | LHCCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.09 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.23 | 1.09 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.983 | -1.653 | -422% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.85M | 6.28B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.92 | 8.26 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.18 | -0.41 | -9,254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.59 | -17.88 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement