LI vs RWX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LI is a Sell and RWX is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- LI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LI (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -3.93% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
LI is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-1.83% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| LI | RWX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 82% | 13 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQMNX | 21.18 | 0.05 | +0.24% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral IS | |||
| LSHEX | 42.05 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
| Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest No Load | |||
| ACSTX | 32.09 | -0.14 | -0.43% |
| Invesco Comstock A | |||
| WLCIX | 15.58 | -0.11 | -0.70% |
| Allspring Large Company Value Inst | |||
| BREIX | 41.31 | -0.36 | -0.86% |
| Baron Real Estate Institutional | |||
LI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LI has been loosely correlated with XPEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LI jumps, then XPEV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LI | 100% | +2.20% | ||
| XPEV - LI | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| BYDDF - LI | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| BYDDY - LI | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| NIO - LI | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| GELYY - LI | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.54% | ||
More | ||||
RWX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RWX has been loosely correlated with SAFE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RWX jumps, then SAFE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RWX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWX | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| SAFE - RWX | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| LAND - RWX | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BLND - RWX | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| AGR - RWX | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| LI - RWX | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||