Advertisement
LIDR vs MAPPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDR is a Buy and MAPPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIDR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LIDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MAPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIDR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAPPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIDR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MAPPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LIDR (@Computer Communications) experienced а -11.81% price change this week, while MAPPF (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.12%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.51%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-0.48% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-1.06% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| LIDR | MAPPF | LIDR / MAPPF | |
| Capitalization | 95.5M | 10.5M | 910% |
| EBITDA | -32.2M | -1.92M | 1,677% |
| Gain YTD | 88.189 | -31.499 | -280% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 236K | 922K | 26% |
| Total Cash | 19.2M | 71.5K | 26,853% |
| Total Debt | 3.06M | 30.9K | 9,896% |
MAPPF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LIDR | MAPPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 79% | about 1 month ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
LIDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIDR has been loosely correlated with QS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIDR jumps, then QS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIDR | 100% | -3.63% | ||
| QS - LIDR | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| INVZ - LIDR | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ARBE - LIDR | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.84% | ||
| HYLN - LIDR | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| HOOD - LIDR | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
More | ||||
MAPPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAPPF and QXO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAPPF and QXO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAPPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPPF | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| QXO - MAPPF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| GUNGF - MAPPF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LIDR - MAPPF | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.63% | ||
| OWLT - MAPPF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| BMBL - MAPPF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
More | ||||