LIDR
Price
$1.32
Change
+$0.01 (+0.76%)
Updated
Aug 10, 02:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
61.14M
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$6.08
Change
-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Updated
Aug 10, 01:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.74B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIDR vs QS

LIDR vs QS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIDR vs. QS commentary
Aug 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDR is a Buy and QS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2026
Stock price -- (LIDR: $1.32 vs. QS: $6.08)
Brand notoriety: LIDR and QS are both not notable
LIDR represents the Computer Communications, while QS is part of the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIDR: 169% vs. QS: 60%
Market capitalization -- LIDR: $61.14M vs. QS: $3.74B
LIDR [@Computer Communications] is valued at $61.14M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.71T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $76.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $34.85B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIDR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LIDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LIDR and QS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIDR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIDR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LIDR and QS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LIDR (@Computer Communications) experienced а +15.79% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +16.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIDR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.60% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.45% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.74B) has a higher market cap than LIDR($61.1M). LIDR YTD gains are higher at: -28.261 vs. QS (-41.651). LIDR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -33.8M vs. QS (-336.7M). QS has more cash in the bank: 859M vs. LIDR (77.2M). LIDR has less debt than QS: LIDR (1.57M) vs QS (67.1M). LIDR has higher revenues than QS: LIDR (270K) vs QS (0).
LIDRQSLIDR / QS
Capitalization61.1M3.74B2%
EBITDA-33.8M-336.7M10%
Gain YTD-28.261-41.65168%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue270K0-
Total Cash77.2M859M9%
Total Debt1.57M67.1M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QS: Fundamental Ratings
QS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIDRQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIDR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LHCIX24.450.57
+2.39%
Lord Abbett Health Care I
BDFUX39.210.89
+2.32%
Baron Discovery R6
TASMX32.830.23
+0.71%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value R6
NSBCX64.620.19
+0.29%
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
CMCIX27.290.07
+0.26%
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap I