LIDR vs QS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDR is a Hold and QS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIDR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LIDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIDR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIDR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- QS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LIDR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.00% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +6.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIDR is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2024.
QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+6.48% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.67% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| LIDR | QS | LIDR / QS | |
| Capitalization | 7.84M | 3.04B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -81.44M | -392.95M | 21% |
| Gain YTD | -59.817 | -27.482 | 218% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.49M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 45.9M | 1.07B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 15.5M | 101M | 15% |
| LIDR | QS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
LIDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIDR has been loosely correlated with QS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIDR jumps, then QS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIDR | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| QS - LIDR | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| INVZ - LIDR | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| GEN - LIDR | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| HYLN - LIDR | 34% Loosely correlated | +27.49% | ||
| HOOD - LIDR | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
More | ||||
QS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.