LIDR
Price
$2.67
Change
+$0.02 (+0.75%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
105.85M
QS
Price
$9.95
Change
+$1.10 (+12.43%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.01B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIDR vs QS

Header iconLIDR vs QS Comparison
Open Charts LIDR vs QSBanner chart's image
AEye
Price$2.67
Change+$0.02 (+0.75%)
Volume$2.83M
Capitalization105.85M
QuantumScape
Price$9.95
Change+$1.10 (+12.43%)
Volume$39.08M
Capitalization5.01B
LIDR vs QS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIDR vs. QS commentary
Sep 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIDR is a Hold and QS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2025
Stock price -- (LIDR: $2.67 vs. QS: $9.95)
Brand notoriety: LIDR and QS are both not notable
LIDR represents the Computer Communications, while QS is part of the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIDR: 12% vs. QS: 88%
Market capitalization -- LIDR: $105.85M vs. QS: $5.01B
LIDR [@Computer Communications] is valued at $105.85M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $5.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $91.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIDR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LIDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LIDR and QS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIDR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIDR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than LIDR.

Price Growth

LIDR (@Computer Communications) experienced а -4.98% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +26.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +71.07%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+4.05% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.50% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($5.01B) has a higher market cap than LIDR($106M). LIDR YTD gains are higher at: 110.236 vs. QS (91.715). LIDR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -32.2M vs. QS (-382.46M). QS has more cash in the bank: 797M vs. LIDR (19.2M). LIDR has less debt than QS: LIDR (3.06M) vs QS (89.4M). LIDR has higher revenues than QS: LIDR (236K) vs QS (0).
LIDRQSLIDR / QS
Capitalization106M5.01B2%
EBITDA-32.2M-382.46M8%
Gain YTD110.23691.715120%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue236K0-
Total Cash19.2M797M2%
Total Debt3.06M89.4M3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIDRQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBUV1.30N/A
N/A
Hubilu Venture Corporation
HUQVF6.53N/A
N/A
Husqvarna AB
NXFNF3.65N/A
N/A
NEXT 15 GROUP PLC
SPEV0.03N/A
N/A
Shorepower Technologies Inc.
SKHSF23.13N/A
N/A
Sekisui House Ltd.

LIDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIDR has been loosely correlated with QS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIDR jumps, then QS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIDR
1D Price
Change %
LIDR100%
+0.75%
QS - LIDR
39%
Loosely correlated
+12.43%
INVZ - LIDR
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ARBE - LIDR
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.29%
HYLN - LIDR
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
HOOD - LIDR
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
+12.43%
SLDP - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.26%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
LIMAF - QS
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
More