LIFFF
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.10 (+5.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
279.45M
SGML
Price
$5.19
Change
+$0.38 (+7.90%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.54B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIFFF vs SGML

Header iconLIFFF vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LIFFF vs SGMLBanner chart's image
Li-Ft Power
Price$1.85
Change+$0.10 (+5.71%)
Volume$113.27K
Capitalization279.45M
Sigma Lithium
Price$5.19
Change+$0.38 (+7.90%)
Volume$3M
Capitalization1.54B
LIFFF vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIFFF vs. SGML commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFFF is a Hold and SGML is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LIFFF: $1.85 vs. SGML: $5.19)
Brand notoriety: LIFFF and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIFFF: 1106% vs. SGML: 186%
Market capitalization -- LIFFF: $279.45M vs. SGML: $1.54B
LIFFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $279.45M. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIFFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIFFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LIFFF and SGML are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIFFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIFFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SGML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGML is a better buy in the short-term than LIFFF.

Price Growth

LIFFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +20.25% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGML is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGML($1.54B) has a higher market cap than LIFFF($279M). LIFFF YTD gains are higher at: 1.753 vs. SGML (-53.743). LIFFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.55M vs. SGML (-82.05M). SGML has more cash in the bank: 38.1M vs. LIFFF (35.3M). SGML has higher revenues than LIFFF: SGML (130M) vs LIFFF (0).
LIFFFSGMLLIFFF / SGML
Capitalization279M1.54B18%
EBITDA-1.55M-82.05M2%
Gain YTD1.753-53.743-3%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0130M-
Total Cash35.3M38.1M93%
Total DebtN/A157M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGML: Fundamental Ratings
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIFFFSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJFAX64.440.82
+1.29%
PGIM Jennison Growth A
RBRCX13.200.08
+0.61%
RBC Small Cap Core R6
DIAMX28.650.11
+0.39%
Diamond Hill Long-Short Inv
HDDVX18.260.04
+0.22%
Janus Henderson International Div D
EISAX27.530.04
+0.15%
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock A

LIFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LIFFF and CVVUF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIFFF and CVVUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFFF
1D Price
Change %
LIFFF100%
+5.82%
CVVUF - LIFFF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
SGML - LIFFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.90%
NILIF - LIFFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
MP - LIFFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
CRECF - LIFFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
More

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
+7.90%
LAR - SGML
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
SCCO - SGML
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
LAC - SGML
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
FCX - SGML
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
BHP - SGML
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More