LIFZF
Price
$20.06
Change
-$0.49 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
MSB
Price
$29.35
Change
+$0.99 (+3.49%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
385.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIFZF vs MSB

Header iconLIFZF vs MSB Comparison
Open Charts LIFZF vs MSBBanner chart's image
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
Price$20.06
Change-$0.49 (-2.38%)
Volume$21.1K
Capitalization1.3B
Mesabi Trust
Price$29.35
Change+$0.99 (+3.49%)
Volume$80.46K
Capitalization385.07M
LIFZF vs MSB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIFZF vs. MSB commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIFZF is a Hold and MSB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LIFZF: $20.06 vs. MSB: $29.35)
Brand notoriety: LIFZF and MSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIFZF: 28% vs. MSB: 211%
Market capitalization -- LIFZF: $1.3B vs. MSB: $385.07M
LIFZF [@Steel] is valued at $1.3B. MSB’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $385.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIFZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LIFZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSB is a better buy in the long-term than LIFZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIFZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIFZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MSB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSB is a better buy in the short-term than LIFZF.

Price Growth

LIFZF (@Steel) experienced а +0.74% price change this week, while MSB (@Steel) price change was +12.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSB is expected to report earnings on Jun 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.65% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIFZF($1.3B) has a higher market cap than MSB($385M). LIFZF has higher P/E ratio than MSB: LIFZF (12.81) vs MSB (4.12). MSB YTD gains are higher at: 29.190 vs. LIFZF (-0.232). LIFZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 147M vs. MSB (19M). MSB has more cash in the bank: 24.2M vs. LIFZF (19M). LIFZF has higher revenues than MSB: LIFZF (187M) vs MSB (23.8M).
LIFZFMSBLIFZF / MSB
Capitalization1.3B385M337%
EBITDA147M19M774%
Gain YTD-0.23229.190-1%
P/E Ratio12.814.12311%
Revenue187M23.8M786%
Total Cash19M24.2M79%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIFZF vs MSB: Fundamental Ratings
LIFZF
MSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1227
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8725
SMR RATING
1..100
449
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LIFZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MSB (7) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew similarly to MSB’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIFZF (87) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's SMR Rating (9) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIFZF (44) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIFZF (76) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSB (97) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew significantly faster than MSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIFZFMSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APDRX35.220.03
+0.09%
Artisan Global Opportunities Advisor
PWGAX20.09N/A
N/A
PACE International Equity A
WSEFX36.64N/A
N/A
Boston Trust Walden Equity
GQLIX34.10N/A
N/A
GMO Quality I
JETNX17.93N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq N

LIFZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIFZF has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIFZF jumps, then MT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFZF
1D Price
Change %
LIFZF100%
-2.36%
MT - LIFZF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
SID - LIFZF
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
TX - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
CLF - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.86%
MSB - LIFZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.49%
More

MSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSB and CLF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSB and CLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSB
1D Price
Change %
MSB100%
+3.49%
CLF - MSB
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.86%
LIFZF - MSB
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
ZEUS - MSB
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
SMSMY - MSB
26%
Poorly correlated
-9.70%
SID - MSB
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
More