LIMAF
Price
$39.79
Change
+$0.30 (+0.76%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
QS
Price
$6.14
Change
+$0.77 (+14.34%)
Updated
Dec 26, 04:24 PM (EDT)
48 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LIMAF vs QS

Header iconLIMAF vs QS Comparison
Open Charts LIMAF vs QSBanner chart's image
Linamar
Price$39.79
Change+$0.30 (+0.76%)
Volume$5.4K
CapitalizationN/A
QuantumScape
Price$6.14
Change+$0.77 (+14.34%)
Volume$30.67K
CapitalizationN/A
LIMAF vs QS Comparison Chart
Loading...
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIMAF vs. QS commentary
Dec 27, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIMAF is a Hold and QS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2024
Stock price -- (LIMAF: $39.79 vs. QS: $5.37)
Brand notoriety: LIMAF and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIMAF: 28% vs. QS: 62%
Market capitalization -- LIMAF: $3.55B vs. QS: $3.04B
LIMAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.55B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIMAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LIMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIMAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIMAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than LIMAF.

Price Growth

LIMAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.20% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +7.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+7.35% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIMAF($3.55B) has a higher market cap than QS($3.04B). LIMAF YTD gains are higher at: -17.852 vs. QS (-22.734). LIMAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.09B vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. LIMAF (891M). QS has less debt than LIMAF: QS (101M) vs LIMAF (1.37B). LIMAF has higher revenues than QS: LIMAF (8.43B) vs QS (0).
LIMAFQSLIMAF / QS
Capitalization3.55B3.04B117%
EBITDA1.09B-392.95M-277%
Gain YTD-17.852-22.73479%
P/E Ratio10.99N/A-
Revenue8.43B0-
Total Cash891M1.07B83%
Total Debt1.37B101M1,352%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIMAF: Fundamental Ratings
LIMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIMAFQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYSIX432.964.79
+1.12%
Rydex Electronics Inv
QUAKX67.560.58
+0.87%
AB Small Cap Growth K
PGRCX52.490.36
+0.69%
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth C
FWCGX64.660.43
+0.67%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc529F3
CNWGX19.350.02
+0.10%
Calamos Evolving World Growth A

LIMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIMAF has been loosely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIMAF jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIMAF
1D Price
Change %
LIMAF100%
+0.77%
MGA - LIMAF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
LEA - LIMAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
AXL - LIMAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
GT - LIMAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
DAN - LIMAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
More