LIMAF
Price
$52.31
Change
-$0.56 (-1.06%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
QS
Price
$7.91
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.48B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIMAF vs QS

Header iconLIMAF vs QS Comparison
Open Charts LIMAF vs QSBanner chart's image
Linamar
Price$52.31
Change-$0.56 (-1.06%)
Volume$15.06K
Capitalization3.15B
QuantumScape
Price$7.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$65.65K
Capitalization4.48B
LIMAF vs QS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIMAF vs. QS commentary
Aug 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIMAF is a Hold and QS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 21, 2025
Stock price -- (LIMAF: $52.31 vs. QS: $7.91)
Brand notoriety: LIMAF and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIMAF: 480% vs. QS: 45%
Market capitalization -- LIMAF: $3.15B vs. QS: $4.48B
LIMAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.15B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $4.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $87.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIMAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LIMAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIMAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIMAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIMAF is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

LIMAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.12% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -15.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.04% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($4.48B) has a higher market cap than LIMAF($3.15B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 52.408 vs. LIMAF (32.430). LIMAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.16B vs. QS (-382.46M). LIMAF has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. QS (797M). QS has less debt than LIMAF: QS (89.4M) vs LIMAF (2.21B). LIMAF has higher revenues than QS: LIMAF (10.2B) vs QS (0).
LIMAFQSLIMAF / QS
Capitalization3.15B4.48B70%
EBITDA1.16B-382.46M-304%
Gain YTD32.43052.40862%
P/E Ratio20.47N/A-
Revenue10.2B0-
Total Cash1B797M126%
Total Debt2.21B89.4M2,474%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIMAF: Fundamental Ratings
LIMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIMAFQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMAQX47.480.27
+0.57%
Principal MidCap R6
IRMAX9.860.02
+0.20%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port A
TSPRX5.68N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Growth R
JVTNX88.20-0.31
-0.35%
Janus Henderson Venture N
TEMZX15.23-0.06
-0.39%
Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Adv

LIMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIMAF has been loosely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIMAF jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIMAF
1D Price
Change %
LIMAF100%
-1.06%
MGA - LIMAF
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
LEA - LIMAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
AXL - LIMAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
GT - LIMAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
DAN - LIMAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
More