Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LIMAX vs RGABX
LIMAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts LIMAX vs RGABX
LIMAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LIMAX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIMAX is a Hold and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LIMAX (23.2M). LIMAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . LIMAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: LIMAX (19 years) vs RGABX (24 years). LIMAX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). LIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIMAX: RGABX (250) vs LIMAX (2000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.41 vs. LIMAX (1.09). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 8.87 vs. LIMAX (-23.08).
| LIMAX | RGABX | LIMAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.38 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.38 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.090 | 8.433 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.2M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.09 | 3.41 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.34 | 37.25 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.08 | 8.87 | -260% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.33 | 86.66 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement