It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LINC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOPE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LINC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOPE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LINC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +6.32% price change this week, while LOPE (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +4.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.06%.
LINC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
LOPE is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
LINC | LOPE | LINC / LOPE | |
Capitalization | 325M | 4.09B | 8% |
EBITDA | 42.6M | 292M | 15% |
Gain YTD | 60.857 | 26.060 | 234% |
P/E Ratio | 12.05 | 20.20 | 60% |
Revenue | 378M | 961M | 39% |
Total Cash | 76M | 245M | 31% |
Total Debt | 117M | 99.3M | 118% |
LINC | LOPE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LOPE's Valuation (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (86). This means that LOPE’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LOPE (19). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to LOPE’s over the last 12 months.
LOPE's SMR Rating (30) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LINC (80). This means that LOPE’s stock grew somewhat faster than LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LOPE (41). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to LOPE’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOPE (64). This means that LINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOPE’s over the last 12 months.
LINC | LOPE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago74% | 10 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago58% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DPRDX | 12.45 | 0.06 | +0.48% |
Delaware Global Listed Real Assets R6 | |||
GBPAUD | 1.93 | 0.00 | +0.06% |
United Kingdom Pound - Australian Dollar | |||
JPYUSD | 0.01 | N/A | N/A |
Japan Yen - United States Dollar | |||
USDNZD | 1.71 | N/A | N/A |
United States Dollar - New Zealand Dollar | |||
CHFNZD | 1.92 | N/A | N/A |
Switzerland Franc - New Zealand Dollar |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LINC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LINC | 100% | +3.53% | ||
GHC - LINC | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
AZZ - LINC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
FC - LINC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
BCO - LINC | 43% Loosely correlated | +3.53% | ||
LOPE - LINC | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOPE has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOPE jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOPE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LOPE | 100% | +2.66% | ||
GHC - LOPE | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
CXW - LOPE | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
ATGE - LOPE | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
PRDO - LOPE | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
DNB - LOPE | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More |