LIND
Price
$11.11
Change
-$1.28 (-10.33%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
483M
5 days until earnings call
MCW
Price
$7.26
Change
-$0.22 (-2.94%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LIND vs MCW

Header iconLIND vs MCW Comparison
Open Charts LIND vs MCWBanner chart's image
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$11.11
Change-$1.28 (-10.33%)
Volume$403.51K
Capitalization483M
Mister Car Wash
Price$7.26
Change-$0.22 (-2.94%)
Volume$1.87M
Capitalization2.44B
LIND vs MCW Comparison Chart
Loading...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LIND vs. MCW commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Hold and MCW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (LIND: $11.11)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCW is a better buy in the short-term than LIND.

Price Growth

LIND (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -15.83% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-0.89% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCW($2.45B) has a higher market cap than LIND($483M). MCW YTD gains are higher at: -0.412 vs. LIND (-6.324). MCW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 248M vs. LIND (54.8M). LIND has more cash in the bank: 157M vs. MCW (19M). LIND has less debt than MCW: LIND (624M) vs MCW (1.77B). MCW has higher revenues than LIND: MCW (927M) vs LIND (570M).
LINDMCWLIND / MCW
Capitalization483M2.45B20%
EBITDA54.8M248M22%
Gain YTD-6.324-0.4121,537%
P/E RatioN/A30.79-
Revenue570M927M61%
Total Cash157M19M826%
Total Debt624M1.77B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDMCW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIQOX36.56N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Z
SNPTX19.04N/A
N/A
DWS Equity Sector Strategy Institutional
FTCEX12.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Total Intl Equity C
FBALX30.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity Balanced
HFDFX19.60N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps F

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been closely correlated with NCLH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then NCLH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
-10.33%
NCLH - LIND
68%
Closely correlated
-6.11%
CCL - LIND
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.46%
TRIP - LIND
44%
Loosely correlated
-8.42%
RCL - LIND
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.95%
BFAM - LIND
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
More

MCW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCW has been loosely correlated with BFAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCW jumps, then BFAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCW
1D Price
Change %
MCW100%
-2.94%
BFAM - MCW
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
TNL - MCW
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.47%
WW - MCW
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
SCI - MCW
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
LIND - MCW
32%
Poorly correlated
-10.33%
More