LION
Price
$11.64
Change
+$0.07 (+0.60%)
Updated
Aug 20, 12:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.45B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCS
Price
$30.39
Change
+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Updated
Aug 20, 12:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
935.76M
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LION vs MCS

LION vs MCS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LION vs. MCS commentary
Aug 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LION is a Hold and MCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2026
Stock price -- (LION: $11.58 vs. MCS: $30.35)
Brand notoriety: LION and MCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Movies/Entertainment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LION: 51% vs. MCS: 113%
Market capitalization -- LION: $3.45B vs. MCS: $935.76M
LION [@Movies/Entertainment] is valued at $3.45B. MCS’s [@Movies/Entertainment] market capitalization is $935.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry ranges from $334.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry is $18.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LION’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LION’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCS is a better buy in the long-term than LION.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LION’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LION’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LION is a better buy in the short-term than MCS.

Price Growth

LION (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а -1.28% price change this week, while MCS (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was +2.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

LION is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

MCS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Movies/Entertainment (-1.45% weekly)

Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LION($3.45B) has a higher market cap than MCS($936M). MCS YTD gains are higher at: 97.518 vs. LION (26.835). LION has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.14B vs. MCS (105M). LION has more cash in the bank: 342M vs. MCS (26.3M). MCS has less debt than LION: MCS (320M) vs LION (3.89B). LION has higher revenues than MCS: LION (2.63B) vs MCS (790M).
LIONMCSLION / MCS
Capitalization3.45B936M368%
EBITDA1.14B105M1,086%
Gain YTD26.83597.51828%
P/E RatioN/A41.01-
Revenue2.63B790M333%
Total Cash342M26.3M1,300%
Total Debt3.89B320M1,216%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LION vs MCS: Fundamental Ratings
LION
MCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5090
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9283
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4735
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7125
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LION's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCS (48) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that LION’s stock grew similarly to MCS’s over the last 12 months.

MCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is significantly better than the same rating for LION (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCS’s stock grew significantly faster than LION’s over the last 12 months.

MCS's SMR Rating (83) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as LION (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCS’s stock grew similarly to LION’s over the last 12 months.

MCS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as LION (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCS’s stock grew similarly to LION’s over the last 12 months.

MCS's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LION (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LION’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIONMCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LION
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IXJ107.363.45
+3.32%
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
INMU23.800.05
+0.21%
iShares Intermediate Muni Income Act ETF
HEQ11.830.01
+0.08%
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
DGLO24.62-0.13
-0.54%
First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF
SEMI37.83-0.50
-1.30%
Columbia Select Technology ETF

LION and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LION has been closely correlated with GIWWU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LION jumps, then GIWWU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LION
1D Price
Change %
LION100%
-0.94%
GIWWU - LION
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
STRZ - LION
38%
Loosely correlated
+6.30%
MCS - LION
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
CNK - LION
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
NWS - LION
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More

MCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCS has been loosely correlated with CNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCS jumps, then CNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCS
1D Price
Change %
MCS100%
+1.95%
CNK - MCS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
AMC - MCS
41%
Loosely correlated
+5.88%
BATRK - MCS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
BATRA - MCS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
PLAY - MCS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
More