| LIT | PIO | LIT / PIO | |
| Gain YTD | 10.696 | -1.248 | -857% |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 263M | 583% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 100% |
| Turnover | 51.63 | 45.00 | 115% |
| Yield | 0.66 | 0.90 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
| LIT | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIO has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIO jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIO | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| ACM - PIO | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| WTRG - PIO | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| TTEK - PIO | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
| TTC - PIO | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ITRI - PIO | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||