| LIT | PIO | LIT / PIO | |
| Gain YTD | 3.681 | 2.447 | 150% |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 271M | 556% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 100% |
| Turnover | 51.63 | 45.00 | 115% |
| Yield | 0.64 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
| LIT | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIO has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIO jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIO | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| ACM - PIO | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| WTRG - PIO | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| TTEK - PIO | 51% Loosely correlated | +5.08% | ||
| TTC - PIO | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| ITRI - PIO | 42% Loosely correlated | +26.23% | ||
More | ||||