LITOF
Price
$0.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
309.1M
SGML
Price
$8.04
Change
-$0.15 (-1.83%)
Updated
Apr 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.54B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LITOF vs SGML

Header iconLITOF vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts LITOF vs SGMLBanner chart's image
Frontier Lithium
Price$0.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.41K
Capitalization309.1M
Sigma Lithium
Price$8.04
Change-$0.15 (-1.83%)
Volume$17.21K
Capitalization1.54B
LITOF vs SGML Comparison Chart
Loading...
LITOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LITOF vs. SGML commentary
May 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITOF is a Hold and SGML is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2025
Stock price -- (LITOF: $0.39 vs. SGML: $8.20)
Brand notoriety: LITOF and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LITOF: 5% vs. SGML: 38%
Market capitalization -- LITOF: $309.1M vs. SGML: $1.54B
LITOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $309.1M. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LITOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LITOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGML is a better buy in the long-term than LITOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LITOF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LITOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SGML’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LITOF is a better buy in the short-term than SGML.

Price Growth

LITOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +6.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

LITOF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

SGML is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.89% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGML($1.54B) has a higher market cap than LITOF($309M). LITOF YTD gains are higher at: 30.435 vs. SGML (-26.916). LITOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -20.51M vs. SGML (-82.05M). SGML has more cash in the bank: 38.1M vs. LITOF (30.2M). LITOF has less debt than SGML: LITOF (196K) vs SGML (157M). SGML has higher revenues than LITOF: SGML (130M) vs LITOF (0).
LITOFSGMLLITOF / SGML
Capitalization309M1.54B20%
EBITDA-20.51M-82.05M25%
Gain YTD30.435-26.916-113%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0130M-
Total Cash30.2M38.1M79%
Total Debt196K157M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LITOF vs SGML: Fundamental Ratings
LITOF
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
527
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8779
SMR RATING
1..100
9594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5592
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LITOF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (89). This means that LITOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (87). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as LITOF (95). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

LITOF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (92). This means that LITOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LITOF (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew significantly faster than LITOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LITOFSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LITOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBVLX16.620.07
+0.42%
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value
APHGX24.190.09
+0.37%
Artisan Global Value Institutional
FTMIX23.88N/A
N/A
First Trust Multi-Strategy Cl I
MAIMX21.02N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value A
SBHEX9.20N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl

LITOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITOF and PILBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITOF and PILBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITOF
1D Price
Change %
LITOF100%
N/A
PILBF - LITOF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.31%
ERO - LITOF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
AAGFF - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
EMX - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
SGML - LITOF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
N/A
LAR - SGML
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
LAC - SGML
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.19%
FCX - SGML
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
SCCO - SGML
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
BHP - SGML
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
More