Ad is loading...
96 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.64K
CapitalizationN/A
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$39.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.22M
CapitalizationN/A
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a StrongSell and SQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +15.09% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.30% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | +2.30% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| WLK - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| OLN - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| SXYAY - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| AVNT - SQM | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
More | ||||