35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.00
Change-$0.09 (-1.77%)
Volume$730
Net Assets10.43M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$33.34
Change-$2.17 (-6.11%)
Volume$7.58K
Capitalization13.99B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 83% | 24 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +8.07% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +12.31% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +19.13% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +10.49% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +15.34% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +16.24% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | +12.31% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 77% Closely correlated | +19.13% | ||
| ALTM - SQM | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PPG - SQM | 50% Loosely correlated | +12.49% | ||
| HUN - SQM | 49% Loosely correlated | +16.41% | ||
| MEOH - SQM | 48% Loosely correlated | +17.01% | ||
More | ||||