83 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Net Assets20.26M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$45.69
Change-$1.25 (-2.66%)
Volume$129
Capitalization13.41B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a StrongBuy and SQM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EATZ | 28.54 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | |||
| MFSM | 24.50 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF | |||
| NMZ | 10.06 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
| Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | |||
| GSJY | 44.23 | -0.11 | -0.24% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF | |||
| UIVM | 60.70 | -0.30 | -0.49% |
| VictoryShares International Val MomtETF | |||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +4.91% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 74% Closely correlated | +7.54% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 73% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 66% Loosely correlated | +11.46% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.47% | ||
More | ||||