61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.16K
CapitalizationN/A
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$38.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$645.39K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Sell and SQM is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | -2.06% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 82% Closely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| CE - SQM | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| AVNT - SQM | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| NGVT - SQM | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ESI - SQM | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
More | ||||