Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LITP vs SQM
LITP vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts LITP vs SQM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$12.17
Change+$0.41 (+3.49%)
Volume$410
Net Assets33.93M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$63.04
Change+$3.64 (+6.13%)
Volume$7.94K
Capitalization18.02B
LITP vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LITP vs. SQM commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LITP is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 24 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 68% Closely correlated | -3.05% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.61% | ||
More | ||||