Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LKBAX vs RLBAX
LKBAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts LKBAX vs RLBAX
LKBAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LKBAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKBAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. LKBAX (109M). LKBAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: LKBAX (1.36) vs RLBAX (1.12). LKBAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: LKBAX (29 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than LKBAX (1.02). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LKBAX (6.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LKBAX: RLBAX (250) vs LKBAX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.51 vs. LKBAX (2.20). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.42 vs. LKBAX (3.81).
| LKBAX | RLBAX | LKBAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.32 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.32 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.657 | 9.204 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 9.51 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.74 | 39.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.81 | 27.42 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.75 | 73.44 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement