LKNCY
Price
$38.49
Change
+$0.50 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.92B
YUMC
Price
$45.76
Change
-$0.19 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.96B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKNCY vs YUMC

Header iconLKNCY vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts LKNCY vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Luckin Coffee
Price$38.49
Change+$0.50 (+1.32%)
Volume$1.16M
Capitalization10.92B
Yum China Holdings
Price$45.76
Change-$0.19 (-0.41%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization16.96B
LKNCY vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKNCY vs. YUMC commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKNCY is a StrongBuy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LKNCY: $38.49 vs. YUMC: $45.76)
Brand notoriety: LKNCY: Not notable vs. YUMC: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKNCY: 69% vs. YUMC: 45%
Market capitalization -- LKNCY: $10.92B vs. YUMC: $16.96B
LKNCY [@Restaurants] is valued at $10.92B. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $16.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKNCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LKNCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the long-term than YUMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKNCY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKNCY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the short-term than LKNCY.

Price Growth

LKNCY (@Restaurants) experienced а +9.63% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

LKNCY is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($17B) has a higher market cap than LKNCY($10.9B). LKNCY has higher P/E ratio than YUMC: LKNCY (24.98) vs YUMC (19.15). LKNCY YTD gains are higher at: 49.942 vs. YUMC (-4.016). LKNCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.79B vs. YUMC (1.7B). LKNCY has more cash in the bank: 5.93B vs. YUMC (1.99B). YUMC has less debt than LKNCY: YUMC (2.37B) vs LKNCY (5.7B). LKNCY has higher revenues than YUMC: LKNCY (37.1B) vs YUMC (11.3B).
LKNCYYUMCLKNCY / YUMC
Capitalization10.9B17B64%
EBITDA5.79B1.7B341%
Gain YTD49.942-4.016-1,244%
P/E Ratio24.9819.15130%
Revenue37.1B11.3B328%
Total Cash5.93B1.99B298%
Total Debt5.7B2.37B241%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKNCY vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
LKNCY
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2025
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
2854
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4130
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YUMC's Valuation (32) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LKNCY (58) in the null industry. This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to LKNCY’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for YUMC (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LKNCY’s stock grew significantly faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as YUMC (54) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as YUMC (51) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LKNCY (41) in the null industry. This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to LKNCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKNCYYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XMHQ100.940.94
+0.94%
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
NTSE33.480.06
+0.19%
WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Effcnt Cr ETF
GLQ7.150.01
+0.14%
Clough Global Equity Fund
DSU10.63-0.02
-0.19%
Blackrock Debt Strategies Fund
NBJP27.97-0.28
-1.01%
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF

LKNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKNCY and HDALF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKNCY and HDALF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKNCY
1D Price
Change %
LKNCY100%
+1.32%
HDALF - LKNCY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YUMC - LKNCY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
JBFCF - LKNCY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFFF - LKNCY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MARZF - LKNCY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
-0.41%
YUM - YUMC
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
QSR - YUMC
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
HDL - YUMC
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
ARCO - YUMC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
FRSH - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
More