LKQ
Price
$38.68
Change
+$0.11 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.24B
20 days until earnings call
NMAKF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
732.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LKQ vs NMAKF

Header iconLKQ vs NMAKF Comparison
Open Charts LKQ vs NMAKFBanner chart's image
LKQ
Price$38.68
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization14.24B
NEMAK S A B DE C V
Price$0.18
Change+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Volume$944
Capitalization732.31M
LKQ vs NMAKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LKQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LKQ vs. NMAKF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKQ is a StrongBuy and NMAKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LKQ: $38.68 vs. NMAKF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: LKQ and NMAKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LKQ: 54% vs. NMAKF: 169%
Market capitalization -- LKQ: $14.24B vs. NMAKF: $732.31M
LKQ [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $14.24B. NMAKF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $732.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LKQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMAKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LKQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMAKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKQ is a better buy in the long-term than NMAKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LKQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMAKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LKQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMAKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LKQ and NMAKF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LKQ (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.34% price change this week, while NMAKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

LKQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.35% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKQ($14.2B) has a higher market cap than NMAKF($732M). LKQ has higher P/E ratio than NMAKF: LKQ (15.10) vs NMAKF (12.12). NMAKF YTD gains are higher at: 90.272 vs. LKQ (6.761). NMAKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.72B vs. LKQ (1.77B). LKQ has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. NMAKF (271M). NMAKF has less debt than LKQ: NMAKF (97.6M) vs LKQ (5.64B). NMAKF has higher revenues than LKQ: NMAKF (94.1B) vs LKQ (13.9B).
LKQNMAKFLKQ / NMAKF
Capitalization14.2B732M1,940%
EBITDA1.77B9.72B18%
Gain YTD6.76190.2727%
P/E Ratio15.1012.12125%
Revenue13.9B94.1B15%
Total Cash299M271M110%
Total Debt5.64B97.6M5,777%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LKQ: Fundamental Ratings
LKQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LKQNMAKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LKQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTGS34.580.31
+0.90%
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
AUGM32.970.05
+0.16%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Aug
EMCB66.210.05
+0.08%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corp Bd ETF
BTRN39.07-0.05
-0.14%
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
FTF6.50-0.01
-0.15%
Franklin Limited

LKQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKQ has been loosely correlated with GTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LKQ jumps, then GTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKQ
1D Price
Change %
LKQ100%
+0.29%
GTX - LKQ
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
THRM - LKQ
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
GNTX - LKQ
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
BWA - LKQ
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
MGA - LKQ
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More

NMAKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMAKF and LKQ have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMAKF and LKQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMAKF
1D Price
Change %
NMAKF100%
N/A
LKQ - NMAKF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
SCTH - NMAKF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLRD - NMAKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHIN - NMAKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
PASTF - NMAKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More