Investors and traders often compare Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and LKQ Corporation (LKQ) due to their positions in the automotive aftermarket industry. This stock comparison examines their business models, recent performance patterns, and market positioning to assist those evaluating sector exposure. The analysis appeals to portfolio managers seeking diversification within industrials and consumer discretionary segments, as well as active traders monitoring relative momentum in related equities. Objective data from financial platforms informs the review of observable factors such as operational focus and external influences.
Genuine Parts Company (GPC) distributes automotive replacement parts, industrial products, and related services through extensive networks across North America and internationally. Recent weeks have seen its stock reflect steady demand for maintenance and repair components amid ongoing vehicle fleet utilization. Market activity has been shaped by supply chain stabilization and consumer patterns in aftermarket spending. Broader economic conditions, including interest rate environments affecting vehicle purchases, have contributed to sentiment around GPC shares. The company’s diversified revenue streams provide a measure of resilience during periods of fluctuating automotive volumes.
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) specializes in alternative automotive parts, including salvage, recycled, and aftermarket components, with significant operations in North America and Europe. In recent market activity, its shares have tracked developments in parts recycling and cost-efficient repair solutions. Performance has been influenced by trends in vehicle repair economics and regulatory factors supporting sustainable sourcing. Sector exposure to used and remanufactured parts positions LKQ to benefit from shifts in consumer preferences toward affordability. Overall positioning remains linked to macroeconomic drivers such as repair frequency and insurance claim volumes.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across various strategies and timeframes. Out of approximately 300 total bots, around 25 to 30 are highlighted based on their suitability for prevailing market conditions, with documented performance reaching up to +241% returns and win rates in the 70–80% range in targeted sectors. These bots employ diverse approaches, including momentum detection and multi-timeframe analysis, applied to thousands of tickers. The section provides traders with insights into adaptive models that identify opportunities across growth areas. Review the full list on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and strategy comparisons.
GPC and LKQ both participate in the automotive aftermarket yet diverge in core operations: GPC emphasizes new parts distribution with industrial diversification, whereas LKQ prioritizes alternative and recycled components. Growth drivers contrast through GPC’s scale in logistics networks versus LKQ’s focus on cost-advantaged salvage supply chains. Recent momentum has varied with each company’s exposure to regional repair markets and inventory management. Risk factors include GPC’s sensitivity to raw material costs and LKQ’s reliance on scrap metal pricing and cross-border operations. Sector exposure overlaps in vehicle maintenance but differs in emphasis on sustainability and new versus used parts. Market sentiment reflects these distinctions, with investors weighing distribution efficiency against recycling economics when assessing relative positioning.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in distribution channels and stability in diversified revenue, Tickeron’s AI models currently indicate a probabilistic preference toward GPC for scenarios emphasizing broad sector resilience. LKQ shows competitive positioning in specialized alternative parts, potentially favored in environments prioritizing cost efficiency. The assessment draws from relative performance patterns and catalyst alignment without definitive projections.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLKQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GPC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
GPC (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while LKQ (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -13.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.28%.
GPC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
LKQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| GPC | LKQ | GPC / LKQ | |
| Capitalization | 17.1B | 5.68B | 301% |
| EBITDA | 742M | 1.31B | 57% |
| Gain YTD | 3.184 | -24.054 | -13% |
| P/E Ratio | 497.48 | 12.47 | 3,989% |
| Revenue | 25.1B | 13.7B | 183% |
| Total Cash | 559M | 301M | 186% |
| Total Debt | 6.65B | 5.31B | 125% |
GPC | LKQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LKQ's Valuation (3) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is significantly better than the same rating for GPC (89) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew significantly faster than GPC’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LKQ (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew similarly to LKQ’s over the last 12 months.
LKQ's SMR Rating (81) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as GPC (91) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to GPC’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LKQ (64) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew similarly to LKQ’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKQ (34) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKQ’s over the last 12 months.
| GPC | LKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 6 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPC has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPC jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPC | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| CPRT - GPC | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LKQ - GPC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| AAP - GPC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| MNRO - GPC | 46% Loosely correlated | -8.89% | ||
| LOW - GPC | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||