Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LKSCX vs WCMLX
LKSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LKSCX vs WCMLX
LKSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LKSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKSCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKSCX has more cash in the bank: 353M vs. WCMLX (50.2M). LKSCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LKSCX (0.01) vs WCMLX (0.00). LKSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LKSCX (32 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LKSCX (1.06). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. LKSCX (40.00). LKSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LKSCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.35 vs. LKSCX (3.19). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.31 vs. LKSCX (-7.24).
| LKSCX | WCMLX | LKSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.99 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.79 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.272 | 7.922 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 50.2M | 703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.19 | 9.35 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.69 | 26.49 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.24 | -6.31 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers