Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LKSCX vs WCMLX
LKSCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LKSCX vs WCMLX
LKSCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LKSCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKSCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKSCX has more cash in the bank: 355M vs. WCMLX (53.4M). LKSCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LKSCX (0.01) vs WCMLX (0.00). LKSCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LKSCX (32 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LKSCX (1.06). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. LKSCX (40.00). LKSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LKSCX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.11 vs. LKSCX (15.69). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.13 vs. LKSCX (-3.75).
| LKSCX | WCMLX | LKSCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.99 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.79 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.907 | 11.410 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 355M | 53.4M | 665% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.69 | 27.11 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 31.25 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.75 | 0.13 | -2,867% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement