Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LKSCX vs WCMNX
LKSCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LKSCX vs WCMNX
LKSCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LKSCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LKSCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKSCX has more cash in the bank: 353M vs. WCMNX (50.2M). LKSCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LKSCX (0.01) vs WCMNX (0.00). LKSCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LKSCX (32 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LKSCX (1.06). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. LKSCX (40.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LKSCX: WCMNX (1000) vs LKSCX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. LKSCX (3.19). LKSCX (-7.24) and WCMNX (-7.54) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LKSCX | WCMNX | LKSCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.24 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.04 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.272 | 7.675 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353M | 50.2M | 703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.19 | 8.96 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.69 | 25.45 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.24 | -7.54 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers