LLLAF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
48.19M
PGXFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LLLAF vs PGXFF

Header iconLLLAF vs PGXFF Comparison
Open Charts LLLAF vs PGXFFBanner chart's image
LEO LITHIUM
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$272.86K
Capitalization48.19M
Prosper Gold
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization2.24M
LLLAF vs PGXFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LLLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LLLAF vs. PGXFF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LLLAF is a Hold and PGXFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LLLAF: $0.04 vs. PGXFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: LLLAF and PGXFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LLLAF: 994% vs. PGXFF: 106%
Market capitalization -- LLLAF: $48.19M vs. PGXFF: $2.24M
LLLAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $48.19M. PGXFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LLLAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGXFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LLLAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LLLAF and PGXFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LLLAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGXFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LLLAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PGXFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGXFF is a better buy in the short-term than LLLAF.

Price Growth

LLLAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -71.43% price change this week, while PGXFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +13.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LLLAF($48.2M) has a higher market cap than PGXFF($2.24M). PGXFF YTD gains are higher at: -35.364 vs. LLLAF (-61.905). LLLAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.35M vs. PGXFF (-2.37M). LLLAF has more cash in the bank: 269M vs. PGXFF (629K).
LLLAFPGXFFLLLAF / PGXFF
Capitalization48.2M2.24M2,152%
EBITDA4.35M-2.37M-183%
Gain YTD-61.905-35.364175%
P/E Ratio7.67N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash269M629K42,766%
Total Debt1.13MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PGXFF: Fundamental Ratings
PGXFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LLLAFPGXFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LLLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPHCF14.72N/A
N/A
Rohto Pharmaceutical Co.
VIRDY72.00N/A
N/A
Viridien
ALPMY11.07-0.12
-1.09%
Astellas Pharma, Inc.
ATMH0.07N/A
-3.87%
ALL THINGS MOBILE ANALYTIC INC.
CBSTF0.10-0.01
-8.41%
THE CANNABIST COMPANY HOLDINGS INC.

LLLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLLAF has been loosely correlated with AUSDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLLAF jumps, then AUSDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LLLAF
1D Price
Change %
LLLAF100%
N/A
AUSDF - LLLAF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WHYRF - LLLAF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
PGXFF - LLLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRLF - LLLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMRPF - LLLAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More

PGXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGXFF and LLLAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGXFF and LLLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGXFF
1D Price
Change %
PGXFF100%
N/A
LLLAF - PGXFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGO - PGXFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
SLVDF - PGXFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
NWCCF - PGXFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+15.10%
KLDCF - PGXFF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More