Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMARX vs NAESX
LMARX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMARX vs NAESX
ClearBridge Small Cap R
Price$65.42
Change+$0.65 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets747.3M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.44
Change+$0.86 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
LMARX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMARX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMARX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. LMARX (747M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMARX: NAESX (1.20) vs LMARX (0.13). LMARX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMARX (19 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LMARX (1.43) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LMARX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. LMARX (6.85). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.43 vs. LMARX (34.61).
| LMARX | NAESX | LMARX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.17 | 841% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.17 | 841% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.721 | 5.746 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 747M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.20 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 12.82 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.04 | 38.26 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.61 | 65.43 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.49 | 130.73 | 33% |