Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMARX vs NAESX
LMARX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMARX vs NAESX
LMARX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMARX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMARX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. LMARX (680M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMARX: NAESX (1.09) vs LMARX (0.00). LMARX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMARX (20 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMARX (1.48) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). LMARX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. LMARX (5.02). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. LMARX (-1.79).
| LMARX | NAESX | LMARX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.17 | 871% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.226 | 12.982 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 680M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.02 | 13.09 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.74 | 49.57 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.79 | 32.77 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.37 | 152.60 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers