Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMASX vs NAESX
LMASX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMASX vs NAESX
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets739.04M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$123.52
Change+$0.57 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
LMASX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMASX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMASX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. LMASX (739M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMASX: NAESX (1.23) vs LMASX (0.36). LMASX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMASX (40 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LMASX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LMASX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. LMASX (2.41). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.97 vs. LMASX (19.49).
| LMASX | NAESX | LMASX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.17 | 1,088% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.17 | 1,094% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.398 | 7.501 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 739M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.23 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | 10.62 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.27 | 42.45 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.49 | 66.97 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.54 | 139.53 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement