Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMASX vs NAESX
LMASX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LMASX vs NAESX
LMASX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMASX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMASX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. LMASX (680M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LMASX: NAESX (1.09) vs LMASX (0.00). LMASX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LMASX (41 years) vs NAESX (66 years). LMASX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LMASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMASX: NAESX (0) vs LMASX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. LMASX (-0.30). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. LMASX (-17.02).
| LMASX | NAESX | LMASX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.17 | 1,088% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.17 | 1,112% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.926 | 12.982 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 680M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.30 | 13.09 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.85 | 49.57 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.02 | 32.77 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.77 | 152.60 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement