Investors navigating the healthcare and medical device landscape often encounter companies that, at first glance, appear broadly similar but diverge sharply upon closer inspection. LMAT (LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.) and UFPT (UFP Technologies, Inc.) represent two such cases. Both are Massachusetts-headquartered healthcare firms with market capitalizations hovering near the $2 billion mark, yet each occupies a distinct niche within the medical ecosystem. This comparison examines how a specialized vascular-device manufacturer stacks up against a contract manufacturing partner to some of the world's largest medical device companies. Whether you are a growth-oriented investor seeking exposure to robotic surgery tailwinds or a value-conscious observer drawn to consistent profitability and shareholder returns, understanding the relative positioning of these two names offers practical insight into current market dynamics.
LeMaitre Vascular designs, manufactures, and markets disposable and implantable vascular devices used primarily by vascular surgeons worldwide. The company's portfolio spans products such as embolectomy catheters, biologic grafts, carotid shunts, and valvulotomes — instruments that address peripheral vascular disease, a condition affecting millions globally. In recent weeks, LMAT shares have traded in the $96 to $106 range, reflecting a stock that has climbed approximately 28% year-to-date while consolidating after reaching its 52-week high near $118.
The company's Q1 2026 results demonstrated continued operational momentum, with earnings per share (EPS) of $0.68 surpassing consensus estimates. This follows a strong fiscal 2025 in which organic sales grew at a mid-teens percentage rate, driven by double-digit gains in catheter and graft product lines. Notably, the international launch of the Artegraft biologic graft has progressed ahead of management's timeline, contributing to above-average growth in the EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) region. Gross margins have expanded to approximately 70%, reflecting favorable pricing power and manufacturing efficiencies. With roughly $343 million in cash against $186 million in debt, LMAT maintains a fortress-like balance sheet, and its quarterly dividend — recently increased to $0.25 per share — underscores a 14-year track record of returning capital to shareholders.
UFP Technologies functions as a contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) that specializes in single-use and single-patient medical devices. Its components and finished devices find application across minimally invasive surgery, infection prevention, wound care, wearables, orthopedic soft goods, and — increasingly — robotic-assisted surgery platforms. In recent market activity, UFPT shares have demonstrated considerable strength, rising from the $185 area in late April to the $255 level by late July, a gain of roughly 39% over approximately three months.
UFPT's Q1 2026 earnings of $2.48 per share handily beat analyst expectations, and full-year 2025 revenue reached $603 million, representing 19.5% growth over the prior year. The company has been actively expanding its manufacturing footprint, including a growing facility in the Dominican Republic with over 300 employees. Two large robotic surgery programs are in the process of launching into commercial production, with management signaling that each should generate meaningful revenue in 2026 and beyond. Customer concentration remains a relevant consideration: two major clients — Intuitive Surgical and Stryker — accounted for approximately 46% of total net sales in 2025. A cyberattack disclosed in early 2026 disrupted billing and delivery functions but did not materially impact financial systems. The company carries a leaner balance sheet than LMAT, with roughly $18 million in cash against $166 million in debt, and does not pay a dividend.
For traders who prefer data-driven decision-making over manual stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway into algorithmic trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers across multiple asset classes. These bots vary widely — some are designed for short-term swing trades lasting a few days, while others pursue multi-week trend-following strategies. Each bot carries its own statistical track record, including metrics such as win rate, average return per trade, and maximum drawdown. Only the highest-conviction and most market-adaptive bots earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section, making it a focused resource for traders seeking to observe which algorithms are currently aligned with prevailing market conditions. Whether your interest lies in LMAT, UFPT, or a broader universe of stocks, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can offer a transparent view into what the AI currently favors.
The most fundamental distinction between these two companies lies in their business models. LMAT is a proprietary product company: it develops, brands, and sells its own medical devices directly to surgeons and hospitals, capturing the full margin on each sale. UFPT, by contrast, is an outsourced manufacturing partner — it produces components and devices on behalf of larger medical device companies, earning a narrower but recurring margin on high-volume production runs. This structural difference explains why LMAT's net margin of approximately 24% dwarfs UFPT's roughly 11%, even though UFPT generates more than twice the absolute revenue.
On valuation, UFPT appears optically cheaper with a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of roughly 29 versus LMAT's 38. However, that discount partly reflects UFPT's higher beta (1.07 versus 0.52), indicating greater sensitivity to broad market swings, as well as customer concentration risk — the loss of either of its two largest clients would materially dent revenue. LMAT's higher multiple is supported by asset-light economics, recurring consumable revenue streams, and a pristine balance sheet. On growth, UFPT holds the near-term edge: its three-month price surge of roughly 39% outpaces any comparable LMAT rally. Yet over a one-year horizon, LMAT's total return of roughly 27% exceeds UFPT's approximate 5% to 7%, driven partly by dividend contributions and steadier price appreciation. From a sector-exposure standpoint, both reside within healthcare, but LMAT's focus on peripheral vascular disease ties it to demographic aging trends, while UFPT's fortunes are closely linked to surgical volume trends and the capital spending cycles of its largest customers. Risk factors diverge as well: LMAT faces regulatory and competitive risks within a niche device market, while UFPT must manage integration challenges from acquisitions and the operational complexity of multi-site contract manufacturing.
Based on observable trend consistency, financial stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely tilt toward LMAT as the more favorable candidate in the current environment, though the comparison is meaningfully nuanced. LMAT's combination of low volatility (beta of 0.52), robust gross margins above 70%, substantial cash reserves exceeding $340 million, and a 14-year dividend growth streak offers a profile that algorithmic models often associate with trend reliability and downside resilience. UFPT's recent momentum is compelling, and its robotic surgery exposure represents a genuine growth catalyst, but the AI would likely weigh the company's customer concentration, narrower margins, and leaner cash position as factors that introduce variability into the trend signal. The probabilistic edge leans toward LMAT for stability-oriented positioning, while UFPT may appeal to models calibrated for higher growth at the cost of greater volatility. As always, the final assessment depends on the specific parameters of any given AI trading bot, and market conditions can shift the balance over time.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LMAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUFPT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LMAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFPT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LMAT (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +5.99% price change this week, while UFPT (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +7.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.67%.
LMAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
UFPT is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.50% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| LMAT | UFPT | LMAT / UFPT | |
| Capitalization | 2.32B | 1.97B | 117% |
| EBITDA | 96.3M | 112M | 86% |
| Gain YTD | 25.531 | 14.750 | 173% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.25 | 29.02 | 128% |
| Revenue | 256M | 609M | 42% |
| Total Cash | 367M | 20M | 1,835% |
| Total Debt | 190M | 156M | 122% |
LMAT | UFPT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMAT's Valuation (17) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for UFPT (87) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that LMAT’s stock grew significantly faster than UFPT’s over the last 12 months.
LMAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as UFPT (43) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that LMAT’s stock grew similarly to UFPT’s over the last 12 months.
UFPT's SMR Rating (52) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as LMAT (54) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that UFPT’s stock grew similarly to LMAT’s over the last 12 months.
UFPT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as LMAT (48) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that UFPT’s stock grew similarly to LMAT’s over the last 12 months.
UFPT's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as LMAT (63) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that UFPT’s stock grew similarly to LMAT’s over the last 12 months.
| LMAT | UFPT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSCX | 32.89 | 0.37 | +1.14% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Jan) ETF | |||
| FLCH | 22.18 | 0.11 | +0.50% |
| Franklin FTSE China ETF | |||
| NFEB | 30.08 | 0.14 | +0.48% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| FPEI | 19.08 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Instl Pref Secs and Inc ETF | |||
| METL | 24.21 | -0.36 | -1.47% |
| Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMAT has been loosely correlated with ITGR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMAT jumps, then ITGR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMAT | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| ITGR - LMAT | 48% Loosely correlated | +20.18% | ||
| SYK - LMAT | 46% Loosely correlated | -6.42% | ||
| UFPT - LMAT | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| AORT - LMAT | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| RDNT - LMAT | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFPT has been loosely correlated with TCMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFPT jumps, then TCMD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UFPT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFPT | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| TCMD - UFPT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| LMAT - UFPT | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| ACRS - UFPT | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| ATR - UFPT | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| SNN - UFPT | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
More | ||||