Ad is loading...
LMCCX vs MVCAX
LMCCX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCCX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$27.05
Change-$0.29 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
LMCCX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCCX vs. MVCAX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCCX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. LMCCX (1.02B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: MVCAX (0.90) vs LMCCX (0.00). LMCCX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCCX (28 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCCX (1000) and MVCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.31 vs. LMCCX (-10.74). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.12 vs. LMCCX (35.95).
| LMCCX | MVCAX | LMCCX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.99 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.00 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.125 | -9.452 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 15.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.74 | -8.31 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.10 | -6.83 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.95 | 55.12 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.46 | 43.47 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers