Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCCX vs MVCAX
LMCCX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCCX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.05
Change+$0.10 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
LMCCX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCCX vs. MVCAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCCX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. LMCCX (1.12B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: MVCAX (0.86) vs LMCCX (0.00). LMCCX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCCX (28 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCCX (1000) and MVCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.16 vs. LMCCX (-9.60). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.10 vs. LMCCX (29.53).
| LMCCX | MVCAX | LMCCX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.99 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.00 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.545 | 5.085 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 17.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.86 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.60 | -4.16 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.73 | 14.01 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.53 | 50.10 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.78 | 74.07 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers