Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCCX vs VEVYX
LMCCX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts LMCCX vs VEVYX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.67
Change+$0.14 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.79
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.96B
LMCCX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCCX vs. VEVYX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCCX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. LMCCX (1.13B). VEVYX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: VEVYX (1.02) vs LMCCX (0.00). LMCCX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: LMCCX (28 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). LMCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. VEVYX (34.00). LMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEVYX: LMCCX (1000) vs VEVYX (1000000). LMCCX (-8.84) and VEVYX (-9.24) have marching annual gain over last year. VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 33.68 vs. LMCCX (30.57).
| LMCCX | VEVYX | LMCCX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.66 | 270% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.66 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.362 | 2.287 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 17B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.84 | -9.24 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.63 | 11.58 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.57 | 33.68 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.71 | 51.08 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement