Ad is loading...
LMCFX vs MVCAX
LMCFX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$30.00
Change+$0.25 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
LMCFX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. MVCAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 15.4B vs. LMCFX (1.01B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: MVCAX (0.90) vs LMCFX (0.77). LMCFX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCFX (18 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than LMCFX (0.88). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCFX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.14 vs. LMCFX (-9.74). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.79 vs. LMCFX (42.19).
| LMCFX | MVCAX | LMCFX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.00 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.875 | -9.648 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 15.4B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.90 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.74 | -8.14 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.12 | -6.94 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.19 | 54.79 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.54 | 42.27 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers