Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCFX vs MVCAX
LMCFX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCFX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$32.52
Change-$0.28 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
LMCFX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCFX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCFX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. LMCFX (1.09B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: MVCAX (0.89) vs LMCFX (0.77). LMCFX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCFX (18 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than LMCFX (0.88). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCFX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.41 vs. LMCFX (-2.83). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.78 vs. LMCFX (48.53).
| LMCFX | MVCAX | LMCFX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.00 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.738 | -0.098 | 1,777% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 16.9B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.89 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.83 | -2.41 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.01 | 13.87 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.53 | 60.78 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.65 | 56.41 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement