Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCHX vs MVCAX
LMCHX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCHX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R6
Price$33.51
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
LMCHX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCHX vs. MVCAX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCHX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.4B vs. LMCHX (1.12B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCHX: MVCAX (0.84) vs LMCHX (0.78). LMCHX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCHX (10 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than LMCHX (0.69). LMCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCHX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.06 vs. LMCHX (-6.36). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.87 vs. LMCHX (40.78).
| LMCHX | MVCAX | LMCHX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.99 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.327 | 4.726 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 17.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.84 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.36 | -4.06 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.54 | 16.90 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.78 | 50.87 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.90 | 78.43 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers