Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMCPX vs MVCAX
LMCPX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCPX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$32.01
Change+$0.13 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
LMCPX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCPX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCPX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. LMCPX (1.09B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: MVCAX (0.87) vs LMCPX (0.38). LMCPX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCPX (28 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCPX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.18 vs. LMCPX (-7.82). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.84 vs. LMCPX (36.74).
| LMCPX | MVCAX | LMCPX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.99 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.00 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.300 | 0.684 | -190% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 16.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.87 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.82 | -6.18 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.68 | 17.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.74 | 50.84 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.84 | 60.15 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement