Ad is loading...
LMCSX vs MVCAX
LMCSX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts LMCSX vs MVCAX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$30.55
Change+$0.33 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
LMCSX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMCSX vs. MVCAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMCSX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. LMCSX (1.02B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than LMCSX: MVCAX (0.90) vs LMCSX (0.58). LMCSX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: LMCSX (10 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). LMCSX (1.03) and MVCAX (1.00) have similar cost to investors . LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: LMCSX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.60 vs. LMCSX (-10.87). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.60 vs. LMCSX (45.16).
| LMCSX | MVCAX | LMCSX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.99 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.00 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.166 | -9.094 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 15.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.90 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.87 | -9.60 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.62 | -4.99 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.16 | 57.60 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers