Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMECX vs WAADX
LMECX vs WAADX Comparison
Open Charts LMECX vs WAADX
LMECX vs WAADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMECX vs. WAADX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMECX is a Hold and WAADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMECX has more cash in the bank: 550M vs. WAADX (93.6M). WAADX pays higher dividends than LMECX: WAADX (4.59) vs LMECX (3.82). LMECX was incepted earlier than WAADX: LMECX (20 years) vs WAADX (6 years). WAADX (0.17) is less costly to investors than LMECX (0.04). WAADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 379.00 vs. LMECX (299.00). LMECX (0) and WAADX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WAADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.24 vs. LMECX (1.94). LMECX (-21.64) and WAADX (-22.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LMECX | WAADX | LMECX / WAADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.17 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.622 | -0.249 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 550M | 93.6M | 588% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.82 | 4.59 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.94 | 2.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.39 | 15.46 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.64 | -22.67 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement