Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs TRQZX
LMGCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs TRQZX
LMGCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. LMGCX (833M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: TRQZX (0.72) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: LMGCX (28 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). LMGCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: TRQZX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). LMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. TRQZX (1.27). LMGCX return over 5 years is better than : -15.57 vs. TRQZX (-16.71).
| LMGCX | TRQZX | LMGCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.61 | 305% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.220 | 2.116 | 909% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833M | 22.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.22 | 1.27 | 961% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.65 | 4.61 | 1,208% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.57 | -16.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement