Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGCX vs TRQZX
LMGCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts LMGCX vs TRQZX
LMGCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGCX vs. TRQZX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGCX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. LMGCX (758M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than LMGCX: TRQZX (0.71) vs LMGCX (0.00). LMGCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: LMGCX (28 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). LMGCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). LMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGCX: TRQZX (0) vs LMGCX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.76 vs. LMGCX (-15.27). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -22.12 vs. LMGCX (-29.80).
| LMGCX | TRQZX | LMGCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.61 | 305% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.255 | 0.488 | 872% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 758M | 21.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.27 | -5.76 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.77 | 0.92 | 4,099% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.80 | -22.12 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement