Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGFX vs RERFX
LMGFX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts LMGFX vs RERFX
LMGFX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGFX vs. RERFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGFX is a Buy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. LMGFX (6.64B). RERFX pays higher dividends than LMGFX: RERFX (2.67) vs LMGFX (1.27). LMGFX was incepted earlier than RERFX: LMGFX (23 years) vs RERFX (24 years). LMGFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). LMGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RERFX (50.00). LMGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERFX: LMGFX (0) vs RERFX (250). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. LMGFX (-4.24). LMGFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.21 vs. RERFX (-3.16).
| LMGFX | RERFX | LMGFX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.52 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.52 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.506 | 7.142 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 140B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.67 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.24 | 4.92 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.45 | 29.66 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.21 | -3.16 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.47 | 50.26 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement