Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGFX vs RERGX
LMGFX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts LMGFX vs RERGX
LMGFX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGFX vs. RERGX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGFX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. LMGFX (7.27B). RERGX pays higher dividends than LMGFX: RERGX (2.69) vs LMGFX (1.23). LMGFX was incepted earlier than RERGX: LMGFX (22 years) vs RERGX (17 years). LMGFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). LMGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RERGX (50.00). LMGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: LMGFX (0) vs RERGX (250). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.23 vs. LMGFX (7.11). LMGFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.57 vs. RERGX (-1.50).
| LMGFX | RERGX | LMGFX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.47 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.47 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.923 | 6.157 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.27B | 143B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 2.69 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 12.23 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.08 | 22.95 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.57 | -1.50 | -968% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.69 | 60.61 | 242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers