Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGFX vs RERGX
LMGFX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts LMGFX vs RERGX
LMGFX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGFX vs. RERGX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGFX is a Hold and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. LMGFX (7.14B). RERGX pays higher dividends than LMGFX: RERGX (2.76) vs LMGFX (1.21). LMGFX was incepted earlier than RERGX: LMGFX (22 years) vs RERGX (17 years). LMGFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). LMGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RERGX (50.00). LMGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: LMGFX (0) vs RERGX (250). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. LMGFX (4.76). LMGFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. RERGX (-0.97).
| LMGFX | RERGX | LMGFX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.47 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.47 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.755 | 5.992 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.14B | 143B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.76 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.76 | 8.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.24 | 27.72 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.78 | -0.97 | -1,415% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.84 | 59.23 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers