Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGFX vs RERGX
LMGFX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts LMGFX vs RERGX
LMGFX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGFX vs. RERGX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGFX is a Hold and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. LMGFX (6.84B). RERGX pays higher dividends than LMGFX: RERGX (2.78) vs LMGFX (1.28). LMGFX was incepted earlier than RERGX: LMGFX (23 years) vs RERGX (17 years). LMGFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). LMGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RERGX (50.00). LMGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: LMGFX (0) vs RERGX (250). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. LMGFX (3.31). LMGFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.20 vs. RERGX (-1.67).
| LMGFX | RERGX | LMGFX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.47 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.47 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.182 | 4.143 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.84B | 141B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 2.78 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 8.69 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.29 | 19.85 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.20 | -1.67 | -612% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.75 | 49.26 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers