Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGNX vs RERFX
LMGNX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts LMGNX vs RERFX
LMGNX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGNX vs. RERFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGNX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. LMGNX (7.45B). RERFX pays higher dividends than LMGNX: RERFX (2.67) vs LMGNX (1.50). LMGNX was incepted earlier than RERFX: LMGNX (22 years) vs RERFX (24 years). LMGNX (0.80) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). LMGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RERFX (50.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGNX: RERFX (250) vs LMGNX (1000000). LMGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. RERFX (10.96). LMGNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.91 vs. RERFX (-4.19).
| LMGNX | RERFX | LMGNX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.52 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.52 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.038 | 4.116 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.45B | 143B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 2.67 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.00 | 10.96 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.68 | 24.61 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.91 | -4.19 | -475% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.35 | 60.10 | 277% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement