Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMGPX vs RERCX
LMGPX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts LMGPX vs RERCX
LMGPX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMGPX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMGPX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. LMGPX (6.64B). RERCX pays higher dividends than LMGPX: RERCX (2.38) vs LMGPX (1.64). LMGPX was incepted earlier than RERCX: LMGPX (8 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than LMGPX (0.69). LMGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RERCX (50.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMGPX: RERCX (250) vs LMGPX (1000000). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. LMGPX (-3.61). LMGPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.74 vs. RERCX (-6.43).
| LMGPX | RERCX | LMGPX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.12 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.12 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.216 | 6.467 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 140B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 2.38 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.61 | 3.80 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.38 | 26.39 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.74 | -6.43 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement