Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMLSX vs RMEBX
LMLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LMLSX vs RMEBX
LMLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMLSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LMLSX (2.39B). LMLSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LMLSX (1.09) vs RMEBX (0.99). LMLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LMLSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LMLSX (0.44). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LMLSX (18.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMLSX: RMEBX (250) vs LMLSX (1000000). LMLSX (4.74) and RMEBX (4.65) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. LMLSX (20.67).
| LMLSX | RMEBX | LMLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.515 | 8.448 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.99 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.74 | 4.65 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | 34.88 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.67 | 34.68 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.82 | 92.45 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers