Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMLSX vs RMEBX
LMLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LMLSX vs RMEBX
LMLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMLSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LMLSX (2.36B). LMLSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LMLSX (1.21) vs RMEBX (1.04). LMLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LMLSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LMLSX (0.44). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LMLSX (18.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMLSX: RMEBX (250) vs LMLSX (1000000). RMEBX (10.14) and LMLSX (10.12) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. LMLSX (18.99).
| LMLSX | RMEBX | LMLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.817 | 6.444 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.04 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 10.14 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.69 | 34.54 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.99 | 35.62 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.78 | 94.57 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement