Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LMLSX vs RMEBX
LMLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LMLSX vs RMEBX
LMLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LMLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LMLSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LMLSX (2.44B). LMLSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LMLSX (1.10) vs RMEBX (0.99). LMLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LMLSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LMLSX (0.44). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LMLSX (18.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMLSX: RMEBX (250) vs LMLSX (1000000). LMLSX (9.42) and RMEBX (9.03) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. LMLSX (21.22).
| LMLSX | RMEBX | LMLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.07 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.146 | 10.367 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.99 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.42 | 9.03 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.45 | 38.30 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.22 | 35.75 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.35 | 90.55 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers